Rivera v. Dept. of Rev.
This text of Rivera v. Dept. of Rev. (Rivera v. Dept. of Rev.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FILED: September 20, 2001
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON
VICTORIO C. RIVERA,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE,
Respondent.
(OTC 4487; SC S48386)
On appeal from the Oregon Tax Court.
William C. Richardson, Judge pro tempore.
Argued and submitted September 7, 2001.
Victorio C. Rivera, appellant pro se, argued the cause and filed the brief.
Melisse S. Cunningham, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent. With her on the brief was Hardy Myers, Attorney General.
Before Carson, Chief Justice, and Gillette, Durham, Leeson, Riggs, and De Muniz, Justices.
PER CURIAM
The judgment of the Oregon Tax Court is affirmed.
This is an appeal from a judgment of the Oregon Tax Court that dismissed taxpayer's complaint (1), denied taxpayer's motion for summary judgment, and denied taxpayer's motion for change of judge.
We have considered each of taxpayer's various submissions in support of his appeal and conclude that none is well taken.
The judgment of the Oregon Tax Court is affirmed.
1. The complaint sought various forms of relief, the precise natures of which are not pertinent to our disposition of this case.
Return to previous location.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Rivera v. Dept. of Rev., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rivera-v-dept-of-rev-or-2001.