Rivera v. Coughlin

188 A.D.2d 725, 590 N.Y.S.2d 607, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13528
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 3, 1992·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Kane, J.), entered March 16, 1992 in Sullivan County, which denied petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to prohibit implementation of regulations imposing a surcharge on inmates found guilty of violating disciplinary rules after certain types of disciplinary proceedings.

Petitioner challenges the promulgation of regulations imposing a surcharge upon a finding that an inmate is guilty of violating disciplinary rules after certain types of disciplinary proceedings. An administrative body promulgating such regulations acts in a legislative capacity (see, Matter of Timber Point Homes v County of Suffolk, 155 AD2d 671, 674). Prohibition is unavailable where, as here, the challenge is to an administrative body’s legislative-type actions (see, Matter of American Tr. Ins. Co. v Corcoran, 65 NY2d 828, 830). Given the ability of petitioner to raise the validity of the regulations in an .administrative appeal and by way of a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 if they are ever applied to him, we find no reason here to convert this proceeding to a declaratory judgment action (see, Matter of City of Newburgh v Public Empl. Relations Bd., 63 NY2d 793; Bower & Gardner v Evans, 60 NY2d 781).

Mikoll, J. P., Yesawich Jr., Levine, Mahoney and Harvey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rivera v. Coughlin, 188 A.D.2d 725, 590 N.Y.S.2d 607, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13528 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

188 A.D.2d 725 (Rivera v. Coughlin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Camp Scatico v. Columbia County Department of Health
277 A.D.2d 689 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Essenberg v. Kresky
265 A.D.2d 664 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)