Rivera v. City of New York

288 A.D.2d 124, 733 N.Y.S.2d 343, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11113
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Rivera v. City of New York. Read the opinion of the Court — 293 A.D.2d 383

Opinion

—Determination of respondent Housing Authority, dated November 1, 1999, dismissing petitioner from his position as a caretaker, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied, and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, New York County [Barbara Kapnick, J.], entered June 28, 2000), dismissed, without costs.

Substantial evidence supported respondent’s determination that petitioner engaged in various forms of serious misconduct, including violent behavior. There is no basis upon which to disturb respondent’s determinations concerning credibility (see, Matter of Berenhaus v Ward, 70 NY2d 436, 443-444). The penalty of dismissal does not shock our sense of fairness (see, Matter of Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32).

We have considered and rejected petitioner’s remaining contentions. Concur — Nardelli, J. P., Williams, Mazzarelli, Lerner and Friedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rivera v. City of New York, 288 A.D.2d 124, 733 N.Y.S.2d 343, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11113 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

288 A.D.2d 124 (Rivera v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kelly v. Safir
747 N.E.2d 1280 (New York Court of Appeals, 2001)
Berenhaus v. Ward
517 N.E.2d 193 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)