Rivera v. Campodonico

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Rivera v. Campodonico

262 A.D.2d 627, 691 N.Y.S.2d 900, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7656

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 28, 1999·Published

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (DiNoto, J.), dated January 6, 1999, as denied his motion for a trial preference.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly denied the plaintiffs motion for a trial preference (see, CPLR 3403 [a] [3]; see also, Stralberg v Mauer, 166 AD2d 522, 523; Srajer v Vanity Fair Mills, 159 AD2d 286; McDaniel v Williams, 23 AD2d 729). Bracken, J. P., Ritter, Altman and Friedmann, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (DiNoto, J.), dated January 6, 1999, as denied his motion for a trial preference.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly denied the plaintiffs motion for a trial preference (see, CPLR 3403 [a] [3]; see also, Stralberg v Mauer, 166 AD2d 522, 523; Srajer v Vanity Fair Mills, 159 AD2d 286; McDaniel v Williams, 23 AD2d 729). Bracken, J. P., Ritter, Altman and Friedmann, JJ., concur.

Rivera v. Campodonico, 262 A.D.2d 627, 691 N.Y.S.2d 900, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7656 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

262 A.D.2d 627 (Rivera v. Campodonico) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related