Rivera v. Byars

Fourth Circuit

Rivera v. Byars

523 F. App'x 227

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 5, 2013·No. No. 13-6271·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kenneth Syncere Rivera appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Rivera v. Byars, No. 8:12-cv-02318-JMC, 2013 WL 504583 (D.S.C. Feb. 12, 2013). We deny Rivera’s motions to appoint counsel and for a tran[228] script at government expense, and we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kenneth Syncere Rivera appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Rivera v. Byars, No. 8:12-cv-02318-JMC, 2013 WL 504583 (D.S.C. Feb. 12, 2013). We deny Rivera’s motions to appoint counsel and for a tran[228] script at government expense, and we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Rivera v. Byars, 523 F. App'x 227 (4th Cir. 2013).

Pincite

523 F. App'x 227 (Rivera v. Byars) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related