Rivera v. Bowers

CourtDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas
DecidedOctober 6, 2020
Docket3:20-cv-00274
StatusUnknown

This text of Rivera v. Bowers (Rivera v. Bowers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rivera v. Bowers, (E.D. Ark. 2020).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION

RUBEN RIVERA PLAITNIFF #45919

V. No. 3:20CV00274-DPM-JTR, and No. 3:20CV00293-JM-JTR

KEITH BOWERS, Administrator, Craighead County Detention Center DEFENDANT

ORDER

Plaintiff Ruben Rivera (“Rivera”) is a pretrial detainee in the Craighead County Detention Center (“CCDC”). On September 10, 2020, he filed a pro se § 1983 Complaint, along with a Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, in Rivera v. Bowers, No. 3:20cv274-DPM-JTR (Docs. 1 & 2). On September 24, 2020, he filed a pro se § 1983 Complaint and a Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, in Rivera v. Bowers, No. 3:20cv293-JM-JTR (Docs. 1 & 2). In both Complaints, Rivera sues CCDC Administrator Keith Bowers (“Bowers”) and alleges that, due to the CCDC’s failure to require proper protective equipment and to properly quarantine, Rivera contracted COVID-19. Rivera cannot maintain two separate cases that assert the same claims. The Court may dismiss a prisoner’s § 1983 action, during § 1915A screening,’ if it is duplicative of a previously filed claim. See Gearhart v. Sarrazine, 553 F. App’x 659, 659-60 (8th Cir. 2014) (affirming preservice dismissal of prisoner’s claims that were duplicative of those in another pending action); Aziz v. Burrows, 976 F.2d 1158, 1158-59 (8th Cir. 1992) (affirming dismissal of “duplicative complaint raising issues directly related to issues in another pending action brought by the same party”’). Accordingly, the Clerk is directed to docket Rivera’s new § 1983 Complaint from No. 3:20cv293-JM-JTR (Doc. 1) as a “Motion to Amend Complaint” in No. 3:20cv274-DPM-JTR. By separate Order, Rivera’s Complaint in No. 3:20cv293-JM-JTR will be dismissed, without prejudice, as raising claims that are duplicative of those that are pending in No. 3:20cv274-DPM-JTR. IT IS SO ORDERED this 6" day of October, 2020.

‘UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

lhe Prison Litigation Reform Act requires federal courts to screen prisoner complaints seeking relief against a governmental entity, officer, or employee. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Rivera v. Bowers, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rivera-v-bowers-ared-2020.