Rivera v. American Skyhawk Insurance
Opinion
We find no error in a summary judgment rendered in favor of the appellee insurance company. Section 627.7282(3), Fla.Stat. (1993)1 is not ambiguous in its terms relative to cancellation of a policy for nonpayment of premiums. The fact that the company gives its customers more than ten days to comply with a premium deficiency notice, does not create an ambiguity. The appellant insured admitted the mailing of the statutory notice, and never claimed payment. The trial court was correct in finding no coverage for an accident occurring some five months after the cancellation date. See Williams v. Security Mut. Casualty Co., 377 [541] So.2d 733 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); Schemer v. Aetna Ins. Co., 251 So.2d 25 (Fla. 1st DCA 1971).
Therefore, the summary judgment under review is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
645 So. 2d 540 (Rivera v. American Skyhawk Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.