Rivera v. American Skyhawk Insurance

645 So. 2d 540, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 10794, 1994 WL 617369
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 9, 1994
DocketNo. 94-80
StatusPublished

This text of 645 So. 2d 540 (Rivera v. American Skyhawk Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rivera v. American Skyhawk Insurance, 645 So. 2d 540, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 10794, 1994 WL 617369 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We find no error in a summary judgment rendered in favor of the appellee insurance company. Section 627.7282(3), Fla.Stat. (1993)1 is not ambiguous in its terms relative to cancellation of a policy for nonpayment of premiums. The fact that the company gives its customers more than ten days to comply with a premium deficiency notice, does not create an ambiguity. The appellant insured admitted the mailing of the statutory notice, and never claimed payment. The trial court was correct in finding no coverage for an accident occurring some five months after the cancellation date. See Williams v. Security Mut. Casualty Co., 377 [541]*541So.2d 733 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); Schemer v. Aetna Ins. Co., 251 So.2d 25 (Fla. 1st DCA 1971).

Therefore, the summary judgment under review is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Williams v. Security Mut. Cas. Co.
377 So. 2d 733 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)
Schemer v. Aetna Insurance Co.
251 So. 2d 25 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1971)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
645 So. 2d 540, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 10794, 1994 WL 617369, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rivera-v-american-skyhawk-insurance-fladistctapp-1994.