Rivera v. 293 Church Realty, LLC

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 8, 2026·No. 2024-13153·Published

Opinion

Rivera v 293 Church Realty, LLC - 2026 NY Slip Op 04334
skip to main content

It appears you are using Adblock. Please disable Adblock to best experience our website.

Law Reporting
Bureau
Thomas J.K. Smith, State Reporter

Rivera v 293 Church Realty, LLC

2026 NY Slip Op 04334

July 8, 2026

Appellate Division, Second Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This decision is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Yvette Rivera, appellant,

v

293 Church Realty, LLC, respondent (and third-party actions).

Supreme Court of the State of New York, Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

Decided on July 8, 2026

2024-13153, (Index No. 502267/20)

Francesca E. Connolly, J.P.

Linda Christopher

Barry E. Warhit

Elena Goldberg Velazquez, JJ.

Sacco & Fillas, LLP, Astoria, NY (Alex Diaz of counsel), for appellant.

Molod Spitz & DeSantis, P.C., New York, NY (Salvatore J. DeSantis and Robert Von Hagen of counsel), for respondent.

[*1]

DECISION & ORDER

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Anne J. Swern, J.), dated October 24, 2024. The order granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff commenced this action to recover damages for personal injuries she allegedly sustained when a restroom light fixture fell from the ceiling and struck her. The defendant moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that it was an out-of-possession landlord. In an order dated October 24, 2024, the Supreme Court granted the defendant's motion. The plaintiff appeals.

"An out-of-possession landlord is not liable for injuries that occur on its premises unless the landlord has retained control over the premises and has a duty imposed by statute or assumed by contract or a course of conduct" (Richer v JQ II Assoc., LLC, 166 AD3d 692, 693 [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Gronski v County of Monroe, 18 NY3d 374, 379).

Here, the defendant established, prima facie, that it was an out-of-possession landlord with no duty to maintain the subject light fixture (see Alexandre v Shih T. Wang, 241 AD3d 1223, 1225; Mejia v 2959 Fulton St. Realty, Inc., 240 AD3d 881, 884). A lease agreement between the defendant and the plaintiff's employer unambiguously placed responsibility for maintaining the restroom where the accident occurred on the plaintiff's employer. Contrary to the plaintiff's contention, the defendant's obligation to maintain the exterior and common areas of the multi-unit commercial building did not demonstrate that the defendant maintained a right to reenter the demised premises and repair the light fixture (see Washington v Jay St. Dev. Corp., 215 AD3d 717, 719).

In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact. The plaintiff did not provide any evidence to suggest that the defendant assumed a duty to maintain the restroom through a course of conduct or that the light fixture fell due to a significant structural or design defect in violation of a specific statutory provision (see Mejia v 2959 Fulton St. Realty, Inc., 240 AD3d at 883-884). An affirmation of the plaintiff's expert that he expected to testify, inter alia, regarding the [*2]likelihood that the plaintiff's accident was caused by moisture from a skylight was speculative, conclusory, and lacking in foundation (see Romano v Stanley, 90 NY2d 444, 451; Jackson v Schindler El. Corp., 236 AD3d 769, 770; Kavenaght v 498 Seventh, LLC, 231 AD3d 720, 722).

Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

The plaintiff's remaining contention is without merit.

CONNOLLY, J.P., CHRISTOPHER, WARHIT and GOLDBERG VELAZQUEZ, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Darrell M. Joseph

Clerk of the Court

Court Decisions

All Court Decisions Official Reports Service Bound Volumes Decision Search

Resources

RSS Feeds Style Manual Citation Tools Opinion Formatting & Privacy Guidelines Opinion Selection Criteria Legal Research Portal Site Index

About

About the Law Reporting Bureau About our Operations Contact Us Twitter

Quick Contact Info

17 Lodge Street

Albany, NY 12207

Phone: (518) 453-6900

Links to or from other sites do not signify endorsement or relationship with them.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rivera v. 293 Church Realty, LLC, (N.Y. Ct. App. 2026).

Rivera v. 293 Church Realty, LLC (Rivera v. 293 Church Realty, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Romano v. Stanley
684 N.E.2d 19 (New York Court of Appeals, 1997)
Gronski v. County of Monroe
963 N.E.2d 1219 (New York Court of Appeals, 2011)