Rivera-Medrano v. Garland

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Rivera-Medrano v. Garland. Read the opinion of the Court — 47 F.4th 29
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·Decided September 1, 2022·No. 20-1667E·Errata

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit

No. 20-1667

KAREN ELIZABETH RIVERA-MEDRANO,

Petitioner,

v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondent.

PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AN ORDER OF THE BOARD OF IMMIGRATION APPEALS

Before

Thompson, Lipez, and Kayatta, Circuit Judges.

ERRATA SHEET The opinion of this Court issued on August 26, 2022 is amended as follows:

Page 25, line 5: The question mark should be changed to a period so that the sentence, as corrected, reads: Were it our job to decide in the first instance whether an IJ is likely to change his or her mind upon review of the new evidence Rivera- Medrano offers, I would side with my colleagues.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rivera-Medrano v. Garland, (1st Cir. 2022).

Rivera-Medrano v. Garland (Rivera-Medrano v. Garland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.