Rivera, M. v.
This text of Rivera, M. v. (Rivera, M. v.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
MICHAEL RIVERA, : No. 12 WM 2021 : Petitioner : : : v. : : : STEVE LESKINEN, NINA CAPUZZI : FRANKHOUSER AND KAREN M. KUHN, : : Respondents :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 6th day of May, 2021, the “Petition for Review Seeking a Writ of
Mandamus” is DENIED, and the Preliminary Objections are DISMISSED AS MOOT. The
Prothonotary is DIRECTED to strike the name of the jurist from the caption.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Rivera, M. v., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rivera-m-v-pa-2021.