Rivera ex rel. Young v. Dodrill

54 F. App'x 7
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedJanuary 7, 2003
DocketNo. 02-5219
StatusPublished

This text of 54 F. App'x 7 (Rivera ex rel. Young v. Dodrill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rivera ex rel. Young v. Dodrill, 54 F. App'x 7 (D.C. Cir. 2003).

Opinion

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, the brief filed by the appellant, and the motion for release pending appeal, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s dismissal of appellant’s petition filed pursuant to D.C.Code Ann. § 16-1901 be affirmed. Appellant is not “a person committed, detained, confined, or restrained from his lawful liberty within the District.” See D.C.Code Ann. § 16-1901(a); McCall v. Swain, 510 F.2d 167 (D.C.Cir.1975); Blair-Bey v. Quick, 151 F.3d 1036, 1042 (D.C.Cir.1998), clarified on reh’g, 159 F.3d 591 (D.C.Cir.1998); Taylor v. Washington, 808 A.2d 770, 774 n. 4 (D.C.2002). It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the motion for release pending appeal be dismissed as moot.

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. RApp. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Taylor v. Washington
808 A.2d 770 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2002)
Blair-Bey v. Quick
151 F.3d 1036 (D.C. Circuit, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
54 F. App'x 7, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rivera-ex-rel-young-v-dodrill-cadc-2003.