Rivera Cabrera v. Industrial Commission

79 P.R. 365
CourtSupreme Court of Puerto Rico
DecidedJune 18, 1956
DocketNo. 494
StatusPublished

This text of 79 P.R. 365 (Rivera Cabrera v. Industrial Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Puerto Rico primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rivera Cabrera v. Industrial Commission, 79 P.R. 365 (prsupreme 1956).

Opinions

Per curiam.

In view of the workman’s idiopathic condition (hypertrophy and acute dilatation of the heart), of which his employer had knowledge, the nature of his work, and the exertion made by him shortly before his death resulting from cardiac collapse brought about by dilatation of the heart, it was established in this case that the workman made the unusual exertion which is required for death to constitute a compensable accident under Act No. 45 of April 18, 1935 (Sess. Laws, p. 250), as amended. See Cordero v. Indus[366]*366trial Commission, 68 P.R.R. 118 (1948); Masse v. James H. Robinson Co., 301 N. Y. 34, 92 N. E. 2d 56 (1950). Consequently, the order of the Industrial Commission will be set aside and the ease is remanded for determination of the corresponding compensation under the law.

The Chief Justice and Mr. Justice Marrero dissented.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Merritt v. Department of Labor & Industries
251 P.2d 158 (Washington Supreme Court, 1952)
Brzozowski's Case
102 N.E.2d 399 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1951)
Claim of Masse v. James H. Robinson Co.
92 N.E.2d 56 (New York Court of Appeals, 1950)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
79 P.R. 365, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rivera-cabrera-v-industrial-commission-prsupreme-1956.