River View Land & Immigration Co. v. Jones
This text of 68 S.E. 620 (River View Land & Immigration Co. v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. Where one person contracts to sell to another real estate in exchange for the performance of personal or professional services, or on like consideration, and the services are performed, and the vendor, instead of making a deed to the land as promised, offers to rescind, and the vendee, accepting the proposal of rescission, sues for the recovery of the amount due him as a result of the rescission, he is entitled to re[91]*91cover the reasonable value of the services performed, not exceeding the value, if any, placed upon them by the parties at the time of making the agreement. ”
2. In the present case there were some inaccuracies in the charge of the court, but as it is clear that the amount of the plaintiff’s recovery was estimated by the jury in accordance with the proposition stated in the foregoing%headnote, which was the material and controlling law point in the ease, there is no reason for reversing the judgment.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
68 S.E. 620, 8 Ga. App. 90, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 42, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/river-view-land-immigration-co-v-jones-gactapp-1910.