River Square Realty Corp. v. Lentini

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

River Square Realty Corp. v. Lentini

2 A.D.3d 232, 768 N.Y.S.2d 319, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13183

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 11, 2003

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 2 A.D.3d 232 (River Square Realty Corp. v. Lentini) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

River Square Realty Corp. v. Lentini, 2 A.D.3d 232, 768 N.Y.S.2d 319, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13183 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

[233]*233Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Marylin Diamond, J.), entered September 23, 2002, which denied defendant’s motion pursuant to CPLR 4404 (b) for a new trial upon his counterclaim for waste, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The minimal appellate record before us provides no basis to conclude that the trial court erred in denying defendant’s motion for a new trial. Defendant’s self-serving account of the events leading to the alleged decrease in potential profits from the building he owned with his family members affords no ground for us to conclude that the trial court’s determination that the counterclaim should be dismissed was premised upon mistakes of fact and erroneous trial rulings, as defendant contends. Concur—Andrias, J.P., Rosenberger, Williams and Lerner, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[233]*233Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Marylin Diamond, J.), entered September 23, 2002, which denied defendant’s motion pursuant to CPLR 4404 (b) for a new trial upon his counterclaim for waste, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The minimal appellate record before us provides no basis to conclude that the trial court erred in denying defendant’s motion for a new trial. Defendant’s self-serving account of the events leading to the alleged decrease in potential profits from the building he owned with his family members affords no ground for us to conclude that the trial court’s determination that the counterclaim should be dismissed was premised upon mistakes of fact and erroneous trial rulings, as defendant contends. Concur—Andrias, J.P., Rosenberger, Williams and Lerner, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 A.D.3d 232, 768 N.Y.S.2d 319, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13183, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/river-square-realty-corp-v-lentini-nyappdiv-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack