River Run Limited Partnership v. Equus Merda Inc.

710 S.E.2d 29, 365 N.C. 203
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedJune 15, 2011
Docket142P11
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 710 S.E.2d 29 (River Run Limited Partnership v. Equus Merda Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
River Run Limited Partnership v. Equus Merda Inc., 710 S.E.2d 29, 365 N.C. 203 (N.C. 2011).

Opinion

710 S.E.2d 29 (2011)

RIVER RUN LIMITED PARTNERSHIP and River Run Property Owners' Association
v.
EQUUS MERDA INC., Louis James Sellman, Marisa A. Sellman, Gregory J. Murphy and wife, Marcy L. Murphy, Joseph E. Pearn, Jr. and wife, Stephanie G. Pearn, Kenneth C. Burnette and wife, Kimberly L. Burnette, Ronald J. Salpietra and wife, Janet M. Salpietra, John E. Haddock, Sr. and wife, Marcia Harris Haddock, Robin M. Johnson and wife, Emily L. Johnson, Kelly J. Sturgill and Melissa D. Arrington, Sherry L. Suprock, James B. Brueggemann and wife, Lisa S. Brueggemann, Michael D. Cortese and wife, Leshia W. Cortese, David E. French, David Hoagland and wife, Tracie Hoagland, CC & C Enterprises Incorporated, Nicholas Peter Mangiapane and wife, Rachel Rae Mangiapane, Steven F. Wolfe and wife, Sheri P. Wolfe, Joseph W. DeSantis and wife, Joanna DeSantis.

No. 142P11.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 15, 2011.

James Scarbrough, Concord, for River Run Limited Partnership.

R. Gregory Lewis, Charlotte, for Murphy, Gregory J., et al.

Andrew S. O'Hara, for Equus Merda Inc.

Robin & Emily L. Johnson, Davidson, for Johnson, Robin M., et al.

Joseph and Joanna DeSantis, for DeSantis, Joseph W., et al.

*30 Thomas L. Ogburn, III, Charlotte, for CC & C Enterprises, Incorporated, et al.

Jeffrey S. Bolster, Charlotte, for Wolfe, Steven F., et al.

Louis & Marisa Sellman, for Sellman, Louis James, et al.

Lew Smith, for Burnette, Kenneth C., et al.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 5th of April 2011 by Plaintiff (River Run Limited Partnership) in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 15th of June 2011."

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Maynard
710 S.E.2d 29 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
710 S.E.2d 29, 365 N.C. 203, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/river-run-limited-partnership-v-equus-merda-inc-nc-2011.