River City Brewing Co. v. Dixon

896 So. 2d 958, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 3947, 2005 WL 670658
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 24, 2005·No. No. 1D05-0009·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Having considered the appellant’s response to this Court’s order to show cause, dated January 31, 2005, the appeal of the “Order on Defendant’s Motion for Remitti-tur,” entered on November 24, 2004, is hereby dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.130(a)(4); Fire & Casualty Ins. Co. of Connecticut v. Sealey, 810 So.2d 988, 991 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002).

ALLEN, DAVIS and BROWNING, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

River City Brewing Co. v. Dixon, 896 So. 2d 958, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 3947, 2005 WL 670658 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

896 So. 2d 958 (River City Brewing Co. v. Dixon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fire & Cas. Ins. Co. of Conn. v. Sealey
810 So. 2d 988 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)