River Bank America v. Stabile

216 A.D.2d 104, 628 N.Y.S.2d 102, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6324
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 15, 1995·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Ira Gammerman, J.), entered on or about January 31, 1995, which granted defendants’ motion seeking to compel plaintiff bank to issue an assignment of the foreclosed upon mortgage and accompanying note to the individual who made the redemption payment for the subject provision, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Inasmuch as an action to foreclose a mortgage is an equitable proceeding (Jamaica Sav. Bank v M. S. Investing Co., 274 NY 215, 219; Blomgren v Tinton 763 Corp., 18 AD2d 979, 980), we agree with the IAS Court that under the circumstances [105]*105herein the plaintiff mortgagee may be compelled to issue an assignment of the mortgage upon full payment of the mortgage indebtedness pursuant to Real Property Law § 275 (see, Goldstein v Soledad Place Corp., 157 Misc 2d 801). Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Wallach, Rubin and Mazzarelli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

River Bank America v. Stabile, 216 A.D.2d 104, 628 N.Y.S.2d 102, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6324 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

216 A.D.2d 104 (River Bank America v. Stabile) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

767 Third Avenue LLC v. ORIX Capital Markets, LLC
26 A.D.3d 216 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Davis v. Cole
193 Misc. 2d 380 (New York Supreme Court, 2002)
2301 Jerome Avenue Realty Corp. v. Di Paolo
190 Misc. 2d 383 (New York Supreme Court, 2002)