Rivenbark v. Ansley

233 So. 2d 157, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 6625
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 2, 1970
DocketNo. L-263
StatusPublished

This text of 233 So. 2d 157 (Rivenbark v. Ansley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rivenbark v. Ansley, 233 So. 2d 157, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 6625 (Fla. Ct. App. 1970).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the Court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and the appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court appealed from herein is affirmed. See Bussey v. Shingleton, 211 So.2d 593 (Fla.App.1968), affirmed in Shingleton v. Bussey, 223 So.2d 713 (Fla. 1969).

JOHNSON, C. J., and CARROLL, DONALD K„ and RAWLS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Shingleton v. Bussey
223 So. 2d 713 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1969)
Bussey v. Shingleton
211 So. 2d 593 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1968)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
233 So. 2d 157, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 6625, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rivenbark-v-ansley-fladistctapp-1970.