Rivas v. INS
This text of Rivas v. INS (Rivas v. INS) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-60621 Summary Calendar
JUAN SENDEJO-RIVAS, Petitioner,
versus
IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.
__________________________________________
Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A14 202 553 __________________________________________
July 29, 1999
Before KING, Chief Judge, HIGGINBOTHAM, and STEWART, Circuit Judges:
PER CURIAM:*
Juan Sendejo-Rivas petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ decision
dismissing his motion to reopen his appeal as untimely.
Due to the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 and the Illegal
Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996, this court lacks jurisdiction to
review Sendejo-Rivas’ petition. See Nguyen v. INS, 117 F.3d 206, 207 (5th Cir. 1997). IT IS
ORDERED that this petition is DISMISSED.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Rivas v. INS, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rivas-v-ins-ca5-1999.