Rivas-Solis v. Mukasey
This text of 301 F. App'x 686 (Rivas-Solis v. Mukasey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Armando Rivas-Solis, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for adjustment of status. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law, Acosta v. Gonzales, 439 F.3d 550, 552 (9th Cir.2006), and we grant the petition for review and remand for further proceedings.
The agency determined that Rivas-Solis was ineligible to adjust his status under Immigration and Nationality Act § 245(i) due to his inadmissibility under § 212(a)(9)(C)(i)(I). At the time of its decision, the BIA did not have the benefit of our decision in Acosta. See id. at 556 (“[A]n alien inadmissible for accruing more than one year of unlawful presence is eligible for penalty-fee adjustment of status.”). We therefore remand for the agency to reconsider Rivas-Solis’ application for adjustment of status in light of our intervening case law.
PETITION FOR REVIEW GRANTED; REMANDED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
301 F. App'x 686, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rivas-solis-v-mukasey-ca9-2008.