Rivas Lopez v. Cardenas Markets, LLC

Opinion

1 2

te OK OK 5 ‘ Maria Rivas-Lopez, Case No. 2:24-cv-01221-JAD-DJA Plaintiff, 7 Order v. 8 9 Cardenas Markets, LLC; et al., Defendants. 10 11 Before the Court is Defendant Cardenas Markets, LLC’s motion to compel third party All 12 || for Health to respond to Defendant’s subpoena for documents. (ECF No. 22). Defendant 13 || explains that All for Health has not responded to the subpoena or to Defendant’s counsel’s 14 || attempts to contact it to arrange a meet and confer. No party responded to the motion, 15 || constituting their consent to the Court granting it. See LR 7-2(d). So, the Court grants 16 || Defendant’s motion to compel. See On Demand Direct Response, LLC v. McCart-Pollak, No. 17 |} 2:15-cv-01576-MMD-GWF, 2019 WL 356797, at *1 (D. Nev. Jan. 29, 2019). 18 19 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant’s motion to compel (ECF No. 22) is 20 || granted. 21 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that All for Health shall comply with the subpoena served 22 || by Defendant no later than June 13, 2025. 23 24 DATED: May 14, 2025, . 25 _f DANIEL J. ALBREGT 26 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 27 28