Riunione Adriatica Di Sicurta v. Medical Malpractice Insurance

237 A.D.2d 140, 655 N.Y.S.2d 353, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2310

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Beverly Cohen, J.), entered May 30, 1996, which, inter alia, denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The court properly determined that the conflicting factual assertions required a jury determination of whether defendant primary insurer’s acts and/or omissions constituted a gross disregard of the insured’s interests amounting to bad faith (Pavia v State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 82 NY2d 445, 452-454; Hartford Ins. Co. v General Acc. Group Ins. Co., 177 AD2d 1046). Concur—Ellerin, J. P., Wallach, Williams and Mazzarelli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Riunione Adriatica Di Sicurta v. Medical Malpractice Insurance, 237 A.D.2d 140, 655 N.Y.S.2d 353, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2310 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

237 A.D.2d 140 (Riunione Adriatica Di Sicurta v. Medical Malpractice Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pavia v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
626 N.E.2d 24 (New York Court of Appeals, 1993)
Hartford Insurance v. General Accident Group Insurance
177 A.D.2d 1046 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)