Ritzman v. Philadelphia & Reading Railroad

40 A. 975, 187 Pa. 337, 1898 Pa. LEXIS 812
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided July 21, 1898·No. Appeal, No. 167·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

On the facts admitted by the plaintiff himself, it was the plain duty of the learned trial judge to enter the compulsory nonsuit, and he was clearly right in refusing to take it off. The failure of the plaintiff to comply with the rule of law that imperatively required him to “ stop, look and listen,” before attempting to cross defendant company’s road at grade, was not merely evidence of negligence, but negligence per se, and a question of law for the court: Railroad v. Beale, 73 Pa. 504; Myers v. B. & O. Railroad Co., 150 Pa. 388, and many other cases that might be cited. The rule is unbending and should be rigidly enforced.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ritzman v. Philadelphia & Reading Railroad, 40 A. 975, 187 Pa. 337, 1898 Pa. LEXIS 812 (Pa. 1898).

40 A. 975 (Ritzman v. Philadelphia & Reading Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Atlantic Refining Co. v. New York, Chicago & St. Louis Railroad
67 Pa. Super. 320 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1917)