Ritz v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Ritz v. State

95 S.W. 518, 49 Tex. Crim. 612, 1906 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 172

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedApril 25, 1906

DocketNo. 3087.

StatusPublished

This text of 95 S.W. 518 (Ritz v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ritz v. State, 95 S.W. 518, 49 Tex. Crim. 612, 1906 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 172 (Tex. 1906).

Pincite

Opinion

BROOKS, Judge.

Appellant was convicted in the justice court for unlawfully carrying a pistol, and appealed to the county court where *613 he was again convicted and his punishment fixed at a fine of $25, and thence attempts to appeal to this court. Appeal will not lie in such case unless the amount of the fine exceeds $100. Therefore the motion of the Assistant Attorney-General to dismiss the appeal is sustained, under the authority of Kruegel v. State, 12 Texas Ct. Rep., 234. Appeal dismissed.

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BROOKS, Judge.

Appellant was convicted in the justice court for unlawfully carrying a pistol, and appealed to the county court where *613 he was again convicted and his punishment fixed at a fine of $25, and thence attempts to appeal to this court. Appeal will not lie in such case unless the amount of the fine exceeds $100. Therefore the motion of the Assistant Attorney-General to dismiss the appeal is sustained, under the authority of Kruegel v. State, 12 Texas Ct. Rep., 234. Appeal dismissed.

Dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

95 S.W. 518, 49 Tex. Crim. 612, 1906 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 172, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ritz-v-state-texcrimapp-1906.