Ritz v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Ritz v. State

95 S.W. 518, 49 Tex. Crim. 612, 1906 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 172

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided April 25, 1906·No. No. 3087.·Published

Opinion

BROOKS, Judge.

Appellant was convicted in the justice court for unlawfully carrying a pistol, and appealed to the county court where *613 he was again convicted and his punishment fixed at a fine of $25, and thence attempts to appeal to this court. Appeal will not lie in such case unless the amount of the fine exceeds $100. Therefore the motion of the Assistant Attorney-General to dismiss the appeal is sustained, under the authority of Kruegel v. State, 12 Texas Ct. Rep., 234. Appeal dismissed.

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BROOKS, Judge.

Appellant was convicted in the justice court for unlawfully carrying a pistol, and appealed to the county court where *613 he was again convicted and his punishment fixed at a fine of $25, and thence attempts to appeal to this court. Appeal will not lie in such case unless the amount of the fine exceeds $100. Therefore the motion of the Assistant Attorney-General to dismiss the appeal is sustained, under the authority of Kruegel v. State, 12 Texas Ct. Rep., 234. Appeal dismissed.

Dismissed.

Ritz v. State, 95 S.W. 518, 49 Tex. Crim. 612, 1906 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 172 (Tex. 1906).

Pincite

95 S.W. 518 (Ritz v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.