Ritz v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Ritz v. State

170 S.W.3d 515, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 957, 2005 WL 1510011

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 28, 2005·No. WD 62689·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Chris Ritz appeals the denial after evi-dentiary hearing of his Rule 29.15 motion for postconviction relief raising nine points of error. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the applicable principles of law would have no precedential or jurisprudential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their in *516 formation only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Chris Ritz appeals the denial after evi-dentiary hearing of his Rule 29.15 motion for postconviction relief raising nine points of error. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the applicable principles of law would have no precedential or jurisprudential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their in *516 formation only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. Rule 84.16(b).

Ritz v. State, 170 S.W.3d 515, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 957, 2005 WL 1510011 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

170 S.W.3d 515 (Ritz v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.