Ritz v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Ritz v. State

170 S.W.3d 515, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 957, 2005 WL 1510011

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 28, 2005

DocketWD 62689

StatusPublished

This text of 170 S.W.3d 515 (Ritz v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ritz v. State, 170 S.W.3d 515, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 957, 2005 WL 1510011 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

Chris Ritz appeals the denial after evi-dentiary hearing of his Rule 29.15 motion for postconviction relief raising nine points of error. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the applicable principles of law would have no precedential or jurisprudential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their in *516 formation only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Chris Ritz appeals the denial after evi-dentiary hearing of his Rule 29.15 motion for postconviction relief raising nine points of error. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the applicable principles of law would have no precedential or jurisprudential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their in *516 formation only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

170 S.W.3d 515, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 957, 2005 WL 1510011, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ritz-v-state-moctapp-2005.