Ritz-Carlton Dev. Co. v. Nath

136 S. Ct. 799, 193 L. Ed. 2d 701, 84 U.S.L.W. 3382, 2016 U.S. LEXIS 45
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided January 11, 2016·No. No. 15–379.·Published

Opinion

On petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Hawaii. Petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the Supreme Court of Hawaii for further consideration in light of DIRECTV, Inc. v. Imburgia, 577 U.S. ----, 136 S.Ct. 463, --- L.E.2d ---- (2015).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ritz-Carlton Dev. Co. v. Nath, 136 S. Ct. 799, 193 L. Ed. 2d 701, 84 U.S.L.W. 3382, 2016 U.S. LEXIS 45 (U.S. 2016).

136 S. Ct. 799 (Ritz-Carlton Dev. Co. v. Nath) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Directv, Inc. v. Imburgia
577 U.S. 47 (Supreme Court, 2015)