Ritz Camera & Image, LLC v. Sandisk Corp.

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ritz Camera & Image, LLC v. Sandisk Corp.. Read the opinion of the Court — 700 F.3d 503
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided July 30, 2012·No. 2012-1183·Unpublished

Opinion

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

RITZ CAMERA & IMAGE, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellee,

V.

SANDISK CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant.

2012-1183

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in case no. 10-CV-2787, Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong.

ORDER

Jim Hood, Attorney General for the State of Missis- sippi, submits a letter in support of the amicus brief filed by the Federal Trade Commission and the U.S. Depart- ment of Justice.

Upon consideration thereof, IT ls ORDERED THAT:

A copy of the letter will be transmitted to the merits panel.

RITZ CAMERA V. SANDISK CORP

JUL 30 2012 Date

cc: Joseph S. Hall, Esq.

Raoul D. Kennedy, Esq.

FOR THE COURT

/s/ J an Horbal§,§ J an Horbaly

Clerk

u FOB

E FEDER!S.L

{RCUIT

JuL 3 0 2012

n

JAN HUHBALV CLERK

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ritz Camera & Image, LLC v. Sandisk Corp., (Fed. Cir. 2012).

Ritz Camera & Image, LLC v. Sandisk Corp. (Ritz Camera & Image, LLC v. Sandisk Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.