Ritts v. Buffalo & Williamsville Electric Railway Co.
162 A.D. 924, 146 N.Y.S. 1110
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 15, 1914
StatusPublished
This text of 162 A.D. 924 (Ritts v. Buffalo & Williamsville Electric Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Ritts v. Buffalo & Williamsville Electric Railway Co., 162 A.D. 924, 146 N.Y.S. 1110 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1914).
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concurred, except Foote, J., who dissented upon the ground that plaintiff does not own the fee of the land in the highway. The title of his grantor, Thayer, extended only to its north line.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
162 A.D. 924, 146 N.Y.S. 1110, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ritts-v-buffalo-williamsville-electric-railway-co-nyappdiv-1914.