Rittmaster v. Jacobson

Second Circuit

Rittmaster v. Jacobson

117 F.3d 721

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedJuly 30, 1997

DocketNo. 2403, Docket 97-7540

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 117 F.3d 721 (Rittmaster v. Jacobson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rittmaster v. Jacobson, 117 F.3d 721 (2d Cir. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Robert and Vera Jacobson appeal from Judge Stein’s approval of a settlement and allocation agreement in this class action and denial of the Jacobsons’ motions to intervene and to be certified as subclass representatives. We affirm for the reasons set forth in Judge Stein’s opinions. In re PaineWebber Ltd. Partnerships Litig., 171 F.R.D. 104 (S.D.N.Y.1997); In re PaineWebber Ltd. Partnership Litig., 174 F.R.D. 35 (S.D.N.Y.1996).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Robert and Vera Jacobson appeal from Judge Stein’s approval of a settlement and allocation agreement in this class action and denial of the Jacobsons’ motions to intervene and to be certified as subclass representatives. We affirm for the reasons set forth in Judge Stein’s opinions. In re PaineWebber Ltd. Partnerships Litig., 171 F.R.D. 104 (S.D.N.Y.1997); In re PaineWebber Ltd. Partnership Litig., 174 F.R.D. 35 (S.D.N.Y.1996).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

117 F.3d 721, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rittmaster-v-jacobson-ca2-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack