Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Rittman v. State

Rittman v. State

114 So. 3d 1067, 2013 WL 2436413, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 8935
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 5, 2013
DocketNo. 1D12-5501
StatusPublished

This text of 114 So. 3d 1067 (Rittman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rittman v. State, 114 So. 3d 1067, 2013 WL 2436413, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 8935 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this Anders1 appeal, we affirm the appellant’s judgment and sentence, but remand for the trial court to enter a written order specifying the condition of probation the appellant was found to have violated. See Leggs v. State, 27 So.3d 155 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010).

AFFIRMED in part and REMANDED in part for entry of a conformed order.

VAN NORTWICK, MARSTILLER, and RAY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Leggs v. State
27 So. 3d 155 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
114 So. 3d 1067, 2013 WL 2436413, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 8935, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rittman-v-state-fladistctapp-2013.