Rittman v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Rittman v. State

114 So. 3d 1067, 2013 WL 2436413, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 8935

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 5, 2013·No. No. 1D12-5501·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this Anders1 appeal, we affirm the appellant’s judgment and sentence, but remand for the trial court to enter a written order specifying the condition of probation the appellant was found to have violated. See Leggs v. State, 27 So.3d 155 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010).

AFFIRMED in part and REMANDED in part for entry of a conformed order.

VAN NORTWICK, MARSTILLER, and RAY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In this Anders1 appeal, we affirm the appellant’s judgment and sentence, but remand for the trial court to enter a written order specifying the condition of probation the appellant was found to have violated. See Leggs v. State, 27 So.3d 155 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010).

AFFIRMED in part and REMANDED in part for entry of a conformed order.

VAN NORTWICK, MARSTILLER, and RAY, JJ., concur.

Rittman v. State, 114 So. 3d 1067, 2013 WL 2436413, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 8935 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

114 So. 3d 1067 (Rittman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related