Ritter v. Wilson

Indiana Supreme Court

Ritter v. Wilson

82 Ind. 601

CourtIndiana Supreme Court

DecidedMay 15, 1882

DocketNo. 9350

StatusPublished

This text of 82 Ind. 601 (Ritter v. Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ritter v. Wilson, 82 Ind. 601 (Ind. 1882).

Pincite

Opinion

Elliott, J.

It is insisted by the appellee that the evidence is notin the record, for the reason that the bill of exceptions does not contain the statement that “ this was all the evidence given in the cause,” or equivalent words. The contention of appellee must prevail.

It is necessary to a proper understanding and decision of the questions involved, that the entire evidence should be examined, Louisville, etc., R. W. Co. v. Murdock, ante, p. 381; and, as it is not in the record, the result is, that the judgment must be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Elliott, J.

It is insisted by the appellee that the evidence is notin the record, for the reason that the bill of exceptions does not contain the statement that “ this was all the evidence given in the cause,” or equivalent words. The contention of appellee must prevail.

It is necessary to a proper understanding and decision of the questions involved, that the entire evidence should be examined, Louisville, etc., R. W. Co. v. Murdock, ante, p. 381; and, as it is not in the record, the result is, that the judgment must be affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

82 Ind. 601, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ritter-v-wilson-ind-1882.