Ritter v. State

958 So. 2d 1093, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 9531, 2007 WL 1753563
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 20, 2007·No. No. 4D05-4859·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, James David Ritter, appeals his conviction and sentence for one count of grand theft of $20,000 or more, but less than $100,000. We affirm. However, our affirmance is without prejudice to Ritter raising his ineffective assistance of counsel claims in a post-conviction motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850.

Affirmed.

WARNER, KLEIN and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ritter v. State, 958 So. 2d 1093, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 9531, 2007 WL 1753563 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

958 So. 2d 1093 (Ritter v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Casamassina v. US Life Ins. Co.
958 So. 2d 1093 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)