Ritter v. State

775 So. 2d 428, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 187, 2001 WL 27556
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 12, 2001·No. No. 5D00-774·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, Daniel Ritter, was convicted of grand theft auto after jury trial. We affirm the conviction but reverse that portion of the sentence relating to the Ninth Circuit’s “collections court program” in accordance with our opinion in Blackiston v. State, 772 So.2d 554 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000).

JUDGMENT AFFIRMED; SENTENCE REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED FOR RESENTENCING [429] IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS OPINION.

COBB, GRIFFIN and ORFINGER, R.B., JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ritter v. State, 775 So. 2d 428, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 187, 2001 WL 27556 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

775 So. 2d 428 (Ritter v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Flowers v. State
781 So. 2d 489 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Mitchell v. State
775 So. 2d 428 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)