Ritter v. State
This text of 775 So. 2d 428 (Ritter v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The appellant, Daniel Ritter, was convicted of grand theft auto after jury trial. We affirm the conviction but reverse that portion of the sentence relating to the Ninth Circuit’s “collections court program” in accordance with our opinion in Blackiston v. State, 772 So.2d 554 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000).
JUDGMENT AFFIRMED; SENTENCE REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED FOR RESENTENCING [429]*429IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS OPINION.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
775 So. 2d 428, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 187, 2001 WL 27556, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ritter-v-state-fladistctapp-2001.