Ritter v. State

528 So. 2d 140, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1700, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3112, 1988 WL 73616
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 20, 1988
DocketNo. 87-3169
StatusPublished

This text of 528 So. 2d 140 (Ritter v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ritter v. State, 528 So. 2d 140, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1700, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3112, 1988 WL 73616 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks to set aside his guilty plea by way of petition for writ of habeas corpus. He has chosen the wrong remedy. We elect to treat this as an appeal from a denial of a motion for post-conviction relief under rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. We affirm the trial court’s order.

HERSEY, C.J., and GUNTHER and STONE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
528 So. 2d 140, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1700, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3112, 1988 WL 73616, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ritter-v-state-fladistctapp-1988.