Ritter v. Proctor

Ninth Circuit

Ritter v. Proctor

102 F.2d 1012, 1939 U.S. App. LEXIS 4029

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedMarch 20, 1939

DocketNo. 9041

StatusPublished

This text of 102 F.2d 1012 (Ritter v. Proctor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ritter v. Proctor, 102 F.2d 1012, 1939 U.S. App. LEXIS 4029 (9th Cir. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause coming before the Court on failure of appellant to file brief as required by rule, and within time extended therefor, and there being no appearance in court on behalf of appellant or opposition to dismissal of appeal, and by direction of the Court, it is ordered that the appeal in this cause be dismissed, that a judgment of dismissal be filed and entered accordingly, and the mandate of this court to issue as provided in Rule 28.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This cause coming before the Court on failure of appellant to file brief as required by rule, and within time extended therefor, and there being no appearance in court on behalf of appellant or opposition to dismissal of appeal, and by direction of the Court, it is ordered that the appeal in this cause be dismissed, that a judgment of dismissal be filed and entered accordingly, and the mandate of this court to issue as provided in Rule 28.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

102 F.2d 1012, 1939 U.S. App. LEXIS 4029, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ritter-v-proctor-ca9-1939.