Ritter v. High Falls Manufacturing Co.

200 N.C. 807
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedMay 20, 1931
StatusPublished

This text of 200 N.C. 807 (Ritter v. High Falls Manufacturing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ritter v. High Falls Manufacturing Co., 200 N.C. 807 (N.C. 1931).

Opinion

Pee Oubiam.

At the close of plaintiff’s evidence and at the close of all the evidence defendant made motions in the court below for judgment as in case of nonsuit. C. S., 567. The court below overruled these motions, and in this we can see no error.

[808]*808We tbink tbe evidence sufficient to- be submitted to tbe jury on tbe questions of negligence and contributory negligence. Boswell v. Hosiery Mills, 191 N. C., 549; Mahaffey v. Furniture Lines, 196 N. C., 810.

As to tbe evidence of fraud in procuring tbe release, we tbink it also sufficient to be submitted to tbe jury. Butler v. Fertilizer Works, 195 N. C., 409. In law we find

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Butler v. Armour Fertilizer Works
142 S.E. 483 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1928)
Mahaffey v. Forsyth Furniture Lines, Inc.
145 S.E. 923 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1928)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
200 N.C. 807, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ritter-v-high-falls-manufacturing-co-nc-1931.