Ritter v. High Falls Manufacturing Co.

200 N.C. 807
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided May 20, 1931·Published

Opinion

Pee Oubiam.

At the close of plaintiff’s evidence and at the close of all the evidence defendant made motions in the court below for judgment as in case of nonsuit. C. S., 567. The court below overruled these motions, and in this we can see no error.

[808]*808We tbink tbe evidence sufficient to- be submitted to tbe jury on tbe questions of negligence and contributory negligence. Boswell v. Hosiery Mills, 191 N. C., 549; Mahaffey v. Furniture Lines, 196 N. C., 810.

As to tbe evidence of fraud in procuring tbe release, we tbink it also sufficient to be submitted to tbe jury. Butler v. Fertilizer Works, 195 N. C., 409. In law we find

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ritter v. High Falls Manufacturing Co., 200 N.C. 807 (N.C. 1931).

200 N.C. 807 (Ritter v. High Falls Manufacturing Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Butler v. Armour Fertilizer Works
142 S.E. 483 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1928)
Mahaffey v. Forsyth Furniture Lines, Inc.
145 S.E. 923 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1928)