Ritter v. High Falls Manufacturing Co.
This text of 200 N.C. 807 (Ritter v. High Falls Manufacturing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
At the close of plaintiff’s evidence and at the close of all the evidence defendant made motions in the court below for judgment as in case of nonsuit. C. S., 567. The court below overruled these motions, and in this we can see no error.
[808]*808We tbink tbe evidence sufficient to- be submitted to tbe jury on tbe questions of negligence and contributory negligence. Boswell v. Hosiery Mills, 191 N. C., 549; Mahaffey v. Furniture Lines, 196 N. C., 810.
As to tbe evidence of fraud in procuring tbe release, we tbink it also sufficient to be submitted to tbe jury. Butler v. Fertilizer Works, 195 N. C., 409. In law we find
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
200 N.C. 807, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ritter-v-high-falls-manufacturing-co-nc-1931.