Ritter v. Getz
This text of 29 A. 112 (Ritter v. Getz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We see no reason for disturbing the discretionary action of the learned court below in this case in setting aside the sheriff’s sale. The reasons stated in the opinion are quite sufficient to justify the action óf the court. The application to set the sale aside was made immediately after the sale and' before the acknowledgment of any deed. The price was grossly inadequate, and the court was at liberty to seize upon any other circumstances in order to give relief. We do not review the action of the lower courts in setting aside sheriff’s sales except in extreme cases, and this is not one of them.
Order affirmed and appeal dismissed at the cost of the appellant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
29 A. 112, 161 Pa. 648, 1894 Pa. LEXIS 748, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ritter-v-getz-pa-1894.