Rittenhouse Plaza, Inc. v. Lichtman

996 A.2d 1063, 606 Pa. 229, 2010 Pa. LEXIS 1357

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Rittenhouse Plaza, Inc. v. Lichtman. Read the opinion of the Court — 598 Pa. 610 →

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided June 23, 2010·No. No. 33 EM 2010·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 23rd day of June, 2010, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal, the Motion for Consolidation, and the “Appli[1064]*1064cation to Reply to Sirlin, Gallogly & Lesser’s Answer to Petitioner’s PAA Nunc Pro Tunc ” are DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rittenhouse Plaza, Inc. v. Lichtman, 996 A.2d 1063, 606 Pa. 229, 2010 Pa. LEXIS 1357 (Pa. 2010).

Pincite

996 A.2d 1063 (Rittenhouse Plaza, Inc. v. Lichtman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.