Ritner v. Holbrook, Cabot & Rollins Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Ritner v. Holbrook, Cabot & Rollins Corp.

175 A.D. 942

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 15, 1916

StatusPublished

This text of 175 A.D. 942 (Ritner v. Holbrook, Cabot & Rollins Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ritner v. Holbrook, Cabot & Rollins Corp., 175 A.D. 942 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

The learned trial court had no discretionary power to allow the amendment to plaintiff’s reply, which had the effect of [943]*943creating a cause of action where none existed. The allowance of the amendment was an error, therefore, for which the judgment must be reversed and a new trial granted, costs to abide the final award of costs. Jenks, P. J., Carr, Mills, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The learned trial court had no discretionary power to allow the amendment to plaintiff’s reply, which had the effect of [943]*943creating a cause of action where none existed. The allowance of the amendment was an error, therefore, for which the judgment must be reversed and a new trial granted, costs to abide the final award of costs. Jenks, P. J., Carr, Mills, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

175 A.D. 942, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ritner-v-holbrook-cabot-rollins-corp-nyappdiv-1916.