Riter's Estate
103 A. 554, 260 Pa. 168, 1918 Pa. LEXIS 487
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided January 7, 1918·No. Appeal, No. 177·Published·Cited by 7 cases
Opinion
It unanswerably appears in the opinion of the learned auditing judge disallowing the claim of the appellant for extra compensation, and in the opinion of the court dismissing the exceptions to the adjudication, that his claim ought not to have been allowed, and, on those opinions, his appeal is dismissed at his costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Riter's Estate, 103 A. 554, 260 Pa. 168, 1918 Pa. LEXIS 487 (Pa. 1918).
103 A. 554 (Riter's Estate) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Reynolds' Estate
60 Pa. D. & C. 90 (Lackawanna County Orphans' Court, 1947)
Sparks's Estate
193 A. 449 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1937)
Davidson's Estate
186 A. 796 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1936)
Gardner's Estate
185 A. 804 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1936)
Griffith's Estate
26 Pa. D. & C. 75 (Washington County Orphans' Court, 1935)
McCaskey's Estate
160 A. 707 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1932)
Estate of Victoria S. Murray, Dec'd.
157 A. 813 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1931)