Ritchy Bienaime v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Ritchy Bienaime v. State

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 5, 2018

Docket5D17-3643

StatusPublished

This text of Ritchy Bienaime v. State (Ritchy Bienaime v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ritchy Bienaime v. State, (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

RITCHY BIENAIME,

Appellant,

v. Case No. 5D17-3643

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

________________________________/

Opinion filed February 9, 2018

3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County, A. James Craner, Judge.

Ritchy Bienaime, Orlando, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Rebecca R. McGuigan, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. We affirm the postconviction court’s dismissal of Appellant’s rule

3.850 motion. We do so without prejudice for Appellant to file a motion for postconviction

relief, if appropriate, upon issuance of the mandate in his previously filed direct appeal,

case number 5D17-3164.

EVANDER, LAMBERT, and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI