Ritchie v. Reincke

236 A.2d 924, 155 Conn. 708
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided December 19, 1967·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The plaintiff has appealed from a judgment of the Superior Court dismissing his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The petition was predicated on our decision in State v. Licari, 153 [709]*709Conn. 127, 132, 214 A.2d 900. Onr decisions in Reed v. Reincke, 155 Conn. 591, 599, 236 A.2d 909, and D’Amico v. Reincke, 155 Conn. 627, 629, 236 A.2d 914, are dispositive of this appeal. The plaintiff: neither made timely claim of any invalidity of the warrant pursuant to which he was arrested nor appealed from the 1964 judgment rendered following his conviction upon a jury trial.

There is no error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ritchie v. Reincke, 236 A.2d 924, 155 Conn. 708 (Colo. 1967).

236 A.2d 924 (Ritchie v. Reincke) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States Ex Rel. Orsini v. Reincke
286 F. Supp. 974 (D. Connecticut, 1968)