Ritchie v. Reincke

236 A.2d 924, 155 Conn. 708
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedDecember 19, 1967
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 236 A.2d 924 (Ritchie v. Reincke) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ritchie v. Reincke, 236 A.2d 924, 155 Conn. 708 (Colo. 1967).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The plaintiff has appealed from a judgment of the Superior Court dismissing his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The petition was predicated on our decision in State v. Licari, 153 [709]*709Conn. 127, 132, 214 A.2d 900. Onr decisions in Reed v. Reincke, 155 Conn. 591, 599, 236 A.2d 909, and D’Amico v. Reincke, 155 Conn. 627, 629, 236 A.2d 914, are dispositive of this appeal. The plaintiff: neither made timely claim of any invalidity of the warrant pursuant to which he was arrested nor appealed from the 1964 judgment rendered following his conviction upon a jury trial.

There is no error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States Ex Rel. Orsini v. Reincke
286 F. Supp. 974 (D. Connecticut, 1968)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
236 A.2d 924, 155 Conn. 708, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ritchie-v-reincke-conn-1967.