Ritchie Multi-Strategy Global, LLC v. Huizenga Managers Fund, LLC

Superior Court of Delaware·Decided March 6, 2019·No. N18C-05-050 MMJ CCLD·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

RITCHIE MULTI-STRATEGY GLOBAL, LLC, f/k/a/ CAPITAL, LLC,

Plaintiff, C.A. N0. N18C-05-050 MMJ CCLD v.

HUIZENGA MANAGERS FUND, LLC,

Defendant.

Submitted: March 4, 2019 Decided: March 6, 2019

On Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss or Stay GRANTED IN PART, DENIED IN PART

ORDER

John A. Sensing, Esq. (Argued), Ryan C. Cicoski, Esq., Potter Anderson & Coroon, LLP, Attorneys for Plaintiff

Steven L. Caponi, Esq., Matthew B. Goeller, Esq., K&L Gates, LLP, Christopher J. Barber, Esq. (Argued), Williams Montgomery & John Ltd., Attorneys for Defendant

JOHNSTON, J.

This is the third case brought in this Court involving the same or closely- related parties. This is the third motion to dismiss or stay on the basis of improper venue.

The same analysis applies in this case as in this Court’s two prior decisions - Ritchie v. Huz`zenga Managers Fund, LLC, 2017 WL 7803924 (Del. Super.) and Rl`tchl'e Multi-Stmtegy Global, LLC v. Hul`zenga Managers Fund, LLC, Del. Super., C.A. No. N18C-05-050 MMJ CCLD (Jan. 15, 2019) (Mem. Op.). For the reasons set forth in those opinions, the Court finds that the Mc Wane‘ factors Weigh in favor of staying this case.

The Court finds that both parties have fee requests pending in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois, in Case No. 07 CH 9626 before the Honorable Peter Flynn. That court retained jurisdiction to hear all fee claims. The issues are in the briefing stage in Illinois. Resolution by Judge Flynn may bear directly on this DelaWare case.

THEREFORE, Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss or Stay is hereby GRANTED IN PART. The Motion to Dismiss is here by DENIED, and the

Motion to Stay is hereby GRANTED. The Court finds that there is a prior action

lMchme Cast lron Pipe Corp. v. McDowell- Wellman Engineering C0., 236 A.2d 281, 283 (Del. 1970).

pending in Illinois, in a court capable of doing prompt and complete justice, involving substantially the same parties and substantially the same issues.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

The %norable/lo[ary M. Johnston

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ritchie Multi-Strategy Global, LLC v. Huizenga Managers Fund, LLC, (Del. Ct. App. 2019).

Ritchie Multi-Strategy Global, LLC v. Huizenga Managers Fund, LLC (Ritchie Multi-Strategy Global, LLC v. Huizenga Managers Fund, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Williams v. MORAN, ETC.
236 A.2d 274 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1967)