Ritchie & Co. v. Lyne
5 Va. 425, 1 Call 489, 1799 Va. LEXIS 8
Opinion
Delivered the resolution of the Court, that the judgment of the District Court ought to be affirmed: That they were in fact cross-suits between the same parties in interest: That it appeared the factor who represented his principals had notice of the time and place of taking the depositions; and, therefore, might have cross-examined the witnesses if he had chosen to do so.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ritchie & Co. v. Lyne, 5 Va. 425, 1 Call 489, 1799 Va. LEXIS 8 (Va. Ct. App. 1799).
5 Va. 425 (Ritchie & Co. v. Lyne) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Minea v. St. Louis Cooperage Co.
162 S.W. 741 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1913)
Field v. Brown
24 Gratt. 74 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1873)
Orr v. Hadley
36 N.H. 575 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1858)
Heirs of Holman v. Bank of Norfolk
12 Ala. 369 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1847)
Lee v. Tapscott
2 Va. 276 (Court of Appeals of Virginia, 1796)