Ritchey v. Herdt

236 N.W. 926, 121 Neb. 874, 1931 Neb. LEXIS 152
CourtNebraska Supreme Court
DecidedJune 10, 1931
DocketNo. 27925
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 236 N.W. 926 (Ritchey v. Herdt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ritchey v. Herdt, 236 N.W. 926, 121 Neb. 874, 1931 Neb. LEXIS 152 (Neb. 1931).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is an action by appellant for compensation under the terms of our workmen’s compensation act. • There was a.trial in the district court and judgment entered therein adverse to claimant, and he appeals.

[875]*875On a careful consideration of the record before us de novo, we are unanimously of the opinion that the disability from which the plaintiff is suffering, lead poisoning, is wholly the result of a disease which- is occupational in its nature and therefore not compensable under the terms of the workmen’s compensation act.

The conclusion of the district court is correct, and its judgment is therefore

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Taylor
375 N.W.2d 610 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
236 N.W. 926, 121 Neb. 874, 1931 Neb. LEXIS 152, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ritchey-v-herdt-neb-1931.