Ristorucci v. Lomenzo
30 A.D.2d 982, 294 N.Y.S.2d 989, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3240
Opinion
We agree with the rationale of Special Term’s opinion [57 Misc 2d 1036]. Additionally, the contention that certain of the voting machines cannot accommodate all slates of presidential electors has no support in the record. Judgment affirmed, without costs. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Aulisi, Staley, Jr., and Gabrielli, JJ., concur in memorandum by the court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ristorucci v. Lomenzo, 30 A.D.2d 982, 294 N.Y.S.2d 989, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3240 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1968).
30 A.D.2d 982 (Ristorucci v. Lomenzo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ristorucci v. Secretary of State of New York
57 Misc. 2d 1036 (New York Supreme Court, 1968)