Ristorucci v. Lomenzo

30 A.D.2d 982, 294 N.Y.S.2d 989, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3240

This text of 30 A.D.2d 982 (Ristorucci v. Lomenzo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ristorucci v. Lomenzo, 30 A.D.2d 982, 294 N.Y.S.2d 989, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3240 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1968).

Opinion

Memorandum by the Court.

We agree with the rationale of Special Term’s opinion [57 Misc 2d 1036]. Additionally, the contention that certain of the voting machines cannot accommodate all slates of presidential electors has no support in the record. Judgment affirmed, without costs. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Aulisi, Staley, Jr., and Gabrielli, JJ., concur in memorandum by the court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ristorucci v. Secretary of State of New York
57 Misc. 2d 1036 (New York Supreme Court, 1968)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
30 A.D.2d 982, 294 N.Y.S.2d 989, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3240, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ristorucci-v-lomenzo-nyappdiv-1968.