Ristorucci v. Lomenzo
This text of 30 A.D.2d 982 (Ristorucci v. Lomenzo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We agree with the rationale of Special Term’s opinion [57 Misc 2d 1036]. Additionally, the contention that certain of the voting machines cannot accommodate all slates of presidential electors has no support in the record. Judgment affirmed, without costs. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Aulisi, Staley, Jr., and Gabrielli, JJ., concur in memorandum by the court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
30 A.D.2d 982, 294 N.Y.S.2d 989, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3240, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ristorucci-v-lomenzo-nyappdiv-1968.