Rist v. Ivey
This text of 1 Ga. L. Rep. 431 (Rist v. Ivey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. Under the act of February 28, 1874- (Acts 1874, p. 175), it was necessary that the comptroller general should make the advertisement required by that act of wildland not returned for taxation, before issuing an execution against them; and until such publication was made, he had no authority to issue such an execution-.
2. Where it appeared that the owner of wild lands had given them ■ in for taxation to the tax receiver of the county, and had paid the taxes to the tax collector, this was all the law required him to do; and a levy and sale under a fi. fa. issued by the comptroller general against the land as unreturned wild land was illegal and void.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 Ga. L. Rep. 431, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rist-v-ivey-ga-1886.