Risley v. Harlow

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Risley v. Harlow

94 N.Y.S. 1161

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 23, 1905

StatusPublished

This text of 94 N.Y.S. 1161 (Risley v. Harlow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Risley v. Harlow, 94 N.Y.S. 1161 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1905).

Pincite

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

Order modified, by striking out the names of George H. Newhall and Richard E. Lyman as persons to be examined; also by limiting persons to be examined, other than those named in said order, to those residing in Rhode Island, and connected or purporting to have been connected as incorporators or otherwise with the Nautical Preparatory School; also by changing the time for said examination from May 1 to 6, 1905, to July 5 to 12, 1905, inclusive; also by providing that at least ■ two days before the date when said examination is to commence plaintiff shall pay to the counsel agreed upon by the defendants, if any, the sum of $150, 'expenses and counsel fee, for attending the execution of said commission. As so modified, said order is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Order modified, by striking out the names of George H. Newhall and Richard E. Lyman as persons to be examined; also by limiting persons to be examined, other than those named in said order, to those residing in Rhode Island, and connected or purporting to have been connected as incorporators or otherwise with the Nautical Preparatory School; also by changing the time for said examination from May 1 to 6, 1905, to July 5 to 12, 1905, inclusive; also by providing that at least ■ two days before the date when said examination is to commence plaintiff shall pay to the counsel agreed upon by the defendants, if any, the sum of $150, 'expenses and counsel fee, for attending the execution of said commission. As so modified, said order is affirmed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

94 N.Y.S. 1161, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/risley-v-harlow-nyappdiv-1905.