Risley v. City of Utica

Second Circuit

Risley v. City of Utica

177 F. 1005, 100 C.C.A. 668, 1910 U.S. App. LEXIS 4459

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedMarch 21, 1910

DocketNo. 256

StatusPublished

This text of 177 F. 1005 (Risley v. City of Utica) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Risley v. City of Utica, 177 F. 1005, 100 C.C.A. 668, 1910 U.S. App. LEXIS 4459 (2d Cir. 1910).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The order appealed from merely preserves the status until final hearing, and it was stated on argument that proofs were being taken and the case would soon he ready for submission. In view of the fact that the appeal is from an order granting a temporary stay and that the Circuit Court; entered an order, upon the consent of all parties in interest, that the money in controversy in the hands of the treasurer of the city of Utica he held by him until the further order of the Circuit Court, it seems best to grant the motion to dismiss the appeal; hut such dismissal is not to be taken as indicating any further expression of opinion on the questions which have been argued here. Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The order appealed from merely preserves the status until final hearing, and it was stated on argument that proofs were being taken and the case would soon he ready for submission. In view of the fact that the appeal is from an order granting a temporary stay and that the Circuit Court; entered an order, upon the consent of all parties in interest, that the money in controversy in the hands of the treasurer of the city of Utica he held by him until the further order of the Circuit Court, it seems best to grant the motion to dismiss the appeal; hut such dismissal is not to be taken as indicating any further expression of opinion on the questions which have been argued here. Appeal dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

177 F. 1005, 100 C.C.A. 668, 1910 U.S. App. LEXIS 4459, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/risley-v-city-of-utica-ca2-1910.