Risley v. Boston Scientific Corporation

District Court, E.D. California·Decided July 15, 2021·No. 2:20-cv-01744·Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 DEBRA RISLEY, et al., Case No. 2:20-cv-001744-AWI-SAB 10 Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE CASE AND ADJUST THE 11 v. DOCKET TO REFLECT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO RULE 41 (a) 12 | BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION, et | OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL al., PROCEDURE 13 Defendants. (ECF No. 132) 14 15 16 On July 14, 2021, a stipulation was filed by Plaintiffs and the remaining Defendants in 17 this action, dismissing this action with prejudice and with each party to bear its own costs and 18 fees. (ECF No. 132.) In light of the stipulation of the parties, this action has been terminated, 19 Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)Gi); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), 29 and has been dismissed with prejudice and without an award of costs or attorneys’ fees. 21 Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is HEREBY ORDERED to CLOSE the file in this 22 case and adjust the docket to reflect voluntary dismissal of this action pursuant to Rule (a). 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 FA. 95 Dated: _July 15, 2021 ; UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 26 27 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Risley v. Boston Scientific Corporation, (E.D. Cal. 2021).

Risley v. Boston Scientific Corporation (Risley v. Boston Scientific Corporation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wilson v. City of San Jose
111 F.3d 688 (Ninth Circuit, 1997)